{"id":614,"date":"2025-04-03T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-04-03T09:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/shapegreatness.org\/?p=614"},"modified":"2025-04-04T17:55:29","modified_gmt":"2025-04-04T17:55:29","slug":"if-they-cut-too-much-people-will-die-health-coalition-pushes-gop-on-medicaid-funding","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/shapegreatness.org\/index.php\/2025\/04\/03\/if-they-cut-too-much-people-will-die-health-coalition-pushes-gop-on-medicaid-funding\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018If They Cut Too Much, People Will Die\u2019: Health Coalition Pushes GOP on Medicaid Funding"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tina Ewing-Wilson remembers the last time major Medicaid cuts slashed her budget.<\/p>\n

In the late 2000s, during the Great Recession, the pot of money she and other Medi-Cal recipients depend on to keep them out of costly residential care homes shrank.<\/p>\n

The only way she could afford help was to offer room and board to a series of live-in caregivers who she said abused alcohol and drugs and eventually subjected her to financial abuse. She vowed to never rely on live-in care again.<\/p>\n

Now the 58-year-old Republican from the Inland Empire is worried Medicaid cuts<\/a> being mulled by her party in Washington could force her into another vulnerable spot.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf they reduce my budget, that doesn\u2019t change the fact that I need 24-hour care,\u201d said Ewing-Wilson, who has struggled with seizures and developmental disabilities her entire life. \u201cIf they cut it too much, people will die or they\u2019ll lose their freedoms.\u201d<\/p>\n

Similar stories have already surfaced in GOP-held swing districts nationwide where activists have been applying political pressure to sway vulnerable House members from supporting $880 billion in cuts that health experts say would almost certainly hit safety net programs. But in California, which sends more Republicans to Congress than any state west of Texas, consumer groups and health industry giants are joining forces in a quieter campaign to lobby lawmakers in solidly red districts, some of which they say would be disproportionately affected<\/a> if those cuts materialize.<\/p>\n

Organizers are trying to highlight a thorny fact that faces many conservative members as they navigate a complex decision: The scale of spending cuts top GOP leaders are demanding is nearly impossible to achieve without slashing Medicaid funds to states, which are a lifeline for their largely poor, rural districts. In Rep. Doug LaMalfa\u2019s northern Sierra district stretching to the Oregon border, for example, some 43% of residents are enrolled in Medi-Cal, while 48% of residents in Rep. Jay Obernolte\u2019s district, centered on San Bernardino County, rely on Medi-Cal.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe hospitals, the health plans \u2014 we don\u2019t always get along with those folks,\u201d said Dustin Corcoran, CEO of the powerful California Medical Association, which represents more than 55,000 doctors and encouraged its members to call their representatives. \u201cOn this, there\u2019s not a lot of daylight. It will take strange bedfellows, for sure.\u201d<\/p>\n

The California Hospital Association has sent letters<\/a> to Republican lawmakers and encouraged executives of its more than 400 member hospitals to reach out or provide tours to them. Consumer advocates and patient groups have protested outside members\u2019 district offices and community health center CEOs have requested private meetings.<\/p>\n

The House of Representatives in February approved a budget framework tasking the committee overseeing Medicaid to cut $880 billion<\/a> over 10 years. While there are still no specific provisions cutting Medicaid, Medicare, or other safety net programs, health care analysts say the magnitude<\/a> of the spending reductions means they\u2019re inevitable<\/a>. They could force millions of Californians<\/a> off Medi-Cal (the state\u2019s Medicaid program covers roughly 15 million people), reduce benefits for those still enrolled, and lower reimbursement rates for physicians at a time of acute provider shortages, said Kristof Stremikis, director of market analysis and insight for the California Health Care Foundation, a nonprofit that advocates on health care policy.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat you\u2019re talking about at the end of the day is reductions in funding that the states, including California, are in no position to make up,\u201d Stremikis said. \u201cYou see that reflected in the different groups that have come together to talk about how important this program is.\u201d<\/p>\n

Even before Congress approved its controversial budget plan, Corcoran said, doctors and other industry representatives had been holding weekly calls for months to discuss how to protect Medicaid funding following Republicans\u2019 substantial wins in November. Corcoran has also rallied physicians\u2019 groups out of state, sending a joint letter<\/a> to House leaders in February. The group has asked individual doctors to call or write their congressional representatives as well.<\/p>\n

Many Republican lawmakers appear to be lying low while home after House leadership advised GOP members<\/a> against holding in-person town halls, blaming Democratic activists for \u201chijacking\u201d the events. A viral clip showed Obernolte getting booed down by constituents<\/a> at a district event.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, LaMalfa said on the House floor in February that the spending resolution, which all nine California Republicans voted for, does not cut Medicaid, Medicare, or other social safety net programs.<\/p>\n

\u201cAny claim to the contrary is actually fearmongering, plain and simple, or I guess in my neighborhood it would be known as a lie,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Neither LaMalfa nor Obernolte responded to requests for comment.<\/p>\n

\n

Jo Campbell, who runs a federally qualified health center in LaMalfa\u2019s district, said she has invited the lawmaker to join her and other local clinic executives to explain how the federal government can cut the $880 billion without touching funding crucial to health centers like hers.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe all kind of live financially on a knife\u2019s edge,\u201d said Campbell, CEO of Hill Country Community Clinic, roughly half of whose patients rely on Medi-Cal. \u201cIt could mean the difference of whether or not we keep our doors open.\u201d<\/p>\n

Campbell hasn\u2019t heard back from LaMalfa\u2019s office.<\/p>\n

Executives at Adventist Health, which has 23 hospitals across California, have met with Central Valley Republican Reps. Vince Fong and David Valadao and have requested a meeting with LaMalfa, with whom they worked closely after one of its hospitals burned in the 2018 Camp Fire.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey\u2019re all at different places,\u201d said Adventist spokesperson Julia Drefke. \u201cI think they understand what it means for their community. What that translates to in terms of their vote could be a different thing.\u201d<\/p>\n

In 2023, Medi-Cal made up more than 80% of patient revenue at Surprise Valley Community Hospital in LaMalfa\u2019s district, for example, and 64% of patient revenue at Loma Linda University Children\u2019s Hospital, in Obernolte\u2019s district, came from Medi-Cal, according to a CHCF analysis of state data.<\/p>\n

Sabrina Epstein, a policy analyst with Disability Rights California, said she\u2019s encouraging local activists, no matter where they live, to engage with California\u2019s congressional Republicans.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt only takes a few votes to keep Medicaid going, to protect it in Congress,\u201d she said. \u201cWe don\u2019t know where those votes are going to come from.\u201d<\/p>\n

Republicans \u2014 swing district or not \u2014 will now have to weigh the popularity of Medicaid among their constituents with pressure from national Republicans who see a once-in-a-generation opportunity to shrink the size of government and have shown little mercy for party members who fall out of line. More than three-quarters of Americans have a favorable opinion of Medicaid, according to a January KFF poll<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Complicating that calculation is the recent revelation by Gov. Gavin Newsom\u2019s administration that California\u2019s Medi-Cal program is billions of dollars short<\/a> and relying on a loan to cover the overrun. Republican state legislators have singled out California\u2019s decision to cover low-income residents regardless of legal status, although other factors have also contributed.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe majority party decided to add billions of dollars to the cost of Medi-Cal and it was so nonsensical,\u201d said GOP Assembly member Joe Patterson. \u201cThat\u2019s a self-inflicted wound.\u201d<\/p>\n

Jenny McLelland, whose 13-year-old son has a breathing disability that requires round-the-clock care, said cutting benefits for immigrants would end up costing taxpayers more, when they show up in emergency rooms with more complicated ailments.<\/p>\n

\u201cI don\u2019t buy the argument that other people are any less deserving of care than my son,\u201d said McLelland, who lives in Clovis, part of Fong\u2019s district. For her son, Medi-Cal is \u201ca matter of life and death,\u201d she added.<\/p>\n

She believes if Fong understood how vital Medi-Cal is to families, he would work to make the system better.<\/p>\n

It remains to be seen whether targeting House Republicans will change minds when a final budget package is voted on. Two vulnerable members \u2014 Valadao<\/a> and Young Kim<\/a>, who represents a district east of Anaheim \u2014 have signaled they\u2019ll oppose major cuts to Medicaid. Rep. Ken Calvert, whose Palm Desert district office was targeted by protesters during the spring recess, said in a statement that he favors work requirements and would not support Medicaid cuts for \u201cmothers, children, disabled, and low-income Americans.\u201d<\/p>\n

In Valadao\u2019s district, state data shows, two-thirds of residents rely on Medi-Cal, which is the single biggest payer for all five general acute care hospitals there. That includes Adventist Health Delano, which derives two-thirds of patient revenue from Medi-Cal, according to the CHCF analysis.<\/p>\n

Most other GOP House members remain silent.<\/p>\n

Ewing-Wilson voted for Obernolte, who won reelection by 20 percentage points and is in little danger of losing. She\u2019s been trying for weeks to get a meeting with him. If he votes to cut Medicaid, she said, \u201cI will be very disappointed in him, because I voted for him, expecting that he would care about all of his constituents.\u201d<\/p>\n

This article was produced by <\/em>KFF Health News<\/em><\/a>, which publishes <\/em>California Healthline<\/em><\/a>, an editorially independent service of the <\/em>California Health Care Foundation<\/em><\/a>.<\/em>\u00a0<\/p>\n

KFF Health News<\/a> is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF\u2014an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF<\/a>.<\/p>\n

USE OUR CONTENT<\/h3>\n

This story can be republished for free (details<\/a>).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tina Ewing-Wilson remembers the last time major Medicaid cuts slashed her budget. In the late 2000s, during the Great Recession, the pot of money she and other Medi-Cal recipients depend on to keep them out of costly residential care homes shrank. The only way she could afford help was to offer room and board to…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":616,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[9],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/shapegreatness.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/614"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/shapegreatness.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/shapegreatness.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/shapegreatness.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/shapegreatness.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=614"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/shapegreatness.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/614\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":615,"href":"http:\/\/shapegreatness.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/614\/revisions\/615"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/shapegreatness.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/616"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/shapegreatness.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/shapegreatness.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/shapegreatness.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}